According to an article about how Democrats are pinning their hopes on sushi, sushi eaters are more attractive.
They don't show a graph in the article, but I'm assuming they are comparing the amount of sushi restaurants in a city and the attractiveness of the people who live there.
Here's the list of the top 25 cities by human attractiveness: LINK
(only Philly is worse than D.C.)
The original article, which I found on the Freakonomics blog, actually talks about how the ratio of steak to sushi places can be correlated to the blueness or redness of a city.
ACOM tends to be conservative, but he loves sushi. So, clearly it doesn't always work.
The article also highlights a few other fun facts:
- fattest vs. fittest cities - steak doesn't necessarily make you fatter
- the most wired cities - no real connection between internet access and the food you eat
- steak-eating, Republican-voting cities are getting bigger faster than their sushi-loving, blue state brethren
